ABDUL WAHEED ZAMAN QURESHI versus ELECTION AUTHORITY
The Punjab Local Government Ordinance 1979 Section 17 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), the powers of the appellant in the notification by the Section 3 High Court, which was shown in the notification about obtaining more votes from the respondent / opposition candidate. The appeal was declared successful. , But then when the Election Authority on the identification of the respondents / opposition candidates found that more than 400 votes obtained by the respondents / opposition candidates were not counted at the time of preparation of the results, the Election Authority, Returning After verifying the error from the officer, the first notification was made according to which the appellant was declared successful and the respondent / opposing candidate was declared as successful / returning candidate, fresh notification was issued. Recalling the first notification of the order and the issuance of the latest notification challenged by the appellant that the Election Authority does not have the option to edit or revert. Earlier, the responsibility of the notification ion authority was assumed under section 17 of the Punjab Local Government Ordinance, 1979, to ensure that the elections were conducted honestly, fairly, justly and in accordance with the law on the basis of polled votes. Including the declaration of results on the basis of which the declaration was made in favor of the appellant. Inaccurate data, which could not be treated as a result of electoral authority, after confirming the disputes of respondents / candidates, maintained that after counting votes that were not previously counted in error, Respondents / Opposition candidate, in fact, appellant Alex
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Patika lawyer