Find a Lawyer

MANZOOR AHMAD WATTO versus GOVERNOR OF THE PROVINCE OF PUNJAB

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Sections 3 (xxvi A), 6A, 9A, 12 (2), Proviso, 12B, 49A [Punjab Local Government (Amendment) Ordinance (Constitution of 1998)] Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 2A, 4, 25, 32 and 199 Constitutional Requests The petition of the Punjab Government Local Government (Amendment) Ordinance, 1998, challenged the validity of some of the provisions of the Punjab Local Government (Amendment) Ordinance 1998 in its constitutional petitions. Was. Arranging the nomination of panchayat and union councils instead of panchayat system and electoral representatives in rural areas, legitimate nomination was a word that could not be secured at the time of current progress. The deputy commissioner who would nominate the members, because the election of people through elections was a norm which was recognized by all civilized societies which would reject the nomination by the government from the Constitution of Pakistan (1973). The provisions of Article 32 were eaten, whereby the state would encourage the municipal bodies comprising elected representatives of the area to form an amendment ordinance that introduced the system of panchayat and introduced nomination at the lower levels. General and the Constitution was against the orders of Pakistan (1973)) Every provision provided under Arts 4 and 25 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) The citizen has the right to be treated equally so that the urban population cannot be treated differently from the rural population and the urban population cannot be kept above the rural population. The rural population was stripped by the issuance of the Amendment Ordinance, it was discriminatory and could not be sustained. It is disputed that the Union Council is useless in the countryside patent advocate from Taunsa sharif lawyer