Find a Lawyer

MIR MAZHAR QAYYUM versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Pakistan (Control) Ordinance Exit 1981 Section 2 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petitioner was named in the Exit Control List, for which he was refused to go abroad. There was no reason for the order preventing the applicant from going abroad as there was an official and departmental inquiry pending the representation of the applicant against such an order was controversial unless the federal government in this case The applicant was named on the control of the Exchequer if he did not file a constitutional application List the recommendations of the Bureau while there is no pending action against the applicant before the freedom of the accountability bureau cannot be reduced to the voice of the federal government and the state has no pending action in this matter. Everyone has the right to the office. Citizens will be treated in accordance with the law and since the power was used in the public interest, state officials were obliged to disclose some evidence under the law, which proves that the applicant's name was executed. They have a reasonable basis for putting him in the control list on which no allegations of fraud, espionage or espionage have been made. Against the applicant, the maximum sentence provided in the department inquiry and related performance and discipline rules was that the dismissal of the federal government service order prohibiting the applicant's name from being placed on the Exit Control List. It was without legal authority. And he was isolated in that situation attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Bolan lawyer