Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Civil Servants Act 1973 Section 17 Basic Rules, FR 17 Litigation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Government employees who perform duties and duties against a higher rank for a specific position. Are entitled to such salaries. The top post government employees, while representing the department, for a higher salary which was rejected by the government employees, instead of appealing to the service tribunal, made another representation before the prime minister who did not respond. Gone, the service tribunal was dismissed after the service employees filed an appeal. Due to some restriction, the civil servant filed an appeal before the service tribunal about ten years after the cause of action was taken, indicating that the public servant's representation was for the first time approximately After a gap of four years. Visit the authorized jurisdiction forum to resolve the delimitation period. And just as a reminder, public servants did not, admittedly, submit a late condolence petition to the service tribunal nor place any material on record that effectively completes the scheduled treatment. While the delay may have been justified, the relevant aspects and the conduct of public servants have clearly indicated that the findings of the service tribunal regarding the ban on filing an appeal are sufficiently valid and unconvincing. The service will help the tribunal, while denying delays, mentioning the appropriate reasons and legal proceedings While diminishing was used in the absolute discretion. Justification, therefore, n jobs for advocates from Jamshoro lawyer