JAFFAR SHAH versus MIAN YAHYA SHAH
Section 17 of the Cantonment Rent Regression Act, 1963, the tenant's eviction and withdrawal order were retained by the High Court on the basis of the payment of rent and the amount fixed in the payment of rent without the landlord's consent. Monthly rent payments and slaughtering were not fatal in her case that she was solely on the tenant to prove both of the petitions, then the eviction request was emphasized and the landlord's lawyer was called to the witness box In support of this application, the landlord will not have to sign the default to pay the landlord's personal advance tenants and retain the application to evict the tenants, as Tanant urges them to submit Paying rent, this will not help, it was accepted by the landlord's lawyer. There was no benefit to the tenant to satisfy the defining factor in the payment of rent. In that premises, all tenants were declared to be the right decision. The rent controller for the default reason for payment of rent. Guarantee the approval of the order and the order of eviction against them
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Mohmand lawyer