Find a Lawyer

IMAM BAKHSH versus STATE

Testimony of Pakistan Panel Code Sections 302 (a) and 302 (c) to the eyewitnesses who were related to the objection expressed dissatisfaction The delay in filing the FIR showed that the eyewitnesses were not present at the time of presence. And later they were acquired and planted. The motive for the murder of the victim was not proven against the accused as it was not unusual or incredible for the young wife of the accused to be satisfied with her old husband and misguided with his brother (s), which led to very serious injuries. ? His wife (the accused) allegedly provoked extreme outrage at his hands by the accused, who alleged that the accused had requested to kill both bodies under the cemetery and sudden provocation, not just at the time of his arrest. But in addition to its statements under Sections 342 and 340 (2), CRPC, and suggestions for it were also given to the witnesses of the prosecution as per the trial case of the case, thus, the section 302 (a), was found to be a more acceptable and acceptable offense of the accused under PPC, resulting in section 302 (c), PPC, and punishment on each count. The death has been changed. Each count was reduced to seven years, the two convictions were ordered to run simultaneously, the accused was also given the benefit of Section 382B, CRPC committed death by immoral act. , The heirs of the deceased were not ordered to pay compensation by the accused ask a advocate free from Lala rukh lawyer