ABDUL RASHEED versus IBRAHIM
Martial Law Regulation 1972 No 115 Para 25 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) premature suit on the basis of the plaintiff's tenancy that the pending suit was decided, pre-discrimination amount was collected and so on One of them had withdrawn it. Subsequently, the defendants filed suit for permanent injunction claiming that the plaintiff be prevented from interfering with the suit in their suit, all defendants' claims were dismissed by the lower courts, including the High Court. The pre-discrimination amount was received by the defendant and the plaintiff's tenancy was accepted, the defendant was prevented from challenging the pre-order, the Revenue Officer was obliged to go to the civil courts Update revenue record in compliance with binding decision, concurrent record recorded by courts below A problem has been refused bail interference of any interference. Under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Diamer lawyer