Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

ABDUL RASHEED versus IBRAHIM


Martial Law Regulation 1972 No 115 Para 25 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) premature suit on the basis of the plaintiff's tenancy that the pending suit was decided, pre-discrimination amount was collected and so on One of them had withdrawn it. Subsequently, the defendants filed suit for permanent injunction claiming that the plaintiff be prevented from interfering with the suit in their suit, all defendants' claims were dismissed by the lower courts, including the High Court. The pre-discrimination amount was received by the defendant and the plaintiff's tenancy was accepted, the defendant was prevented from challenging the pre-order, the Revenue Officer was obliged to go to the civil courts Update revenue record in compliance with binding decision, concurrent record recorded by courts below A problem has been refused bail interference of any interference. Under the circumstances

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
pakistani advocates Diamer lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.