Find a Lawyer

GHAFOOR AHMAD versus COLLECTOR, CONSOLIDATION, JHELUM, OFFICE AT ATTOCK, DISTRICT ATTOCK

West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967 Section 53 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Revenue records The grievance complaint in the petitioner was that the respondent was threatening to change some of the entries in the revenue record to the detriment of the applicants. ? It is alleged that the revenue record is with the disciplinary officer, even if he had the mind, he could not convert the question entries to the High Court. On the basis of that fact, he dismissed the applicants. The validity of the constitutional petition has not yet been finalized. To file their complaint to constitutional applicants - the biggest complaint was that the Revenue Record threatened to change the relevant entries. Would be detrimental to the interest of The respondent denied such a claim, and therefore, the High Court rightly rejected it. Applicants fear that irregular entries are likely to be filed in the rally The venue record was completely misunderstood, there was no case for interference, in which case the leave to appeal to the Supreme Court was not granted. Was given attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Phool nagar lawyer