Find a Lawyer

GHULAM HABIB versus HIDAYAT ULLAH KHAN AFRIDI

Representation of Articles 52 and 55 of the People's Act 1976 Election Request The provisional candidate's claim that the election application was misunderstood as represented in Sections 5 and 55, the Public Representation Act 1976 and to suppress the material facts Claims were not tolerated. On the other hand, the order of the election petition, to deal with discipline, appeared, as it contained material facts and grounds on which the election was challenged, as well as the witnesses' affidavit and specific The required receipt was also available. Therefore, the Election Request was not misunderstood nor compelled to suppress material facts in accordance with the provisions of Section 55 & A, 55, Public Representation Act, 1976. registration advocate from Kalam lawyer