Find a Lawyer

IFTIKHAR ALI versus THE STATE

Articles 302 (b), 324 and 353 define testimony that the dead bodies were not subjected to post-mortem, yet this exception was inconvenient because the victim's death as a result of the violence, ie the shooting, was questioned by the accused. Not done The names and site plans of the witnesses in the FIR were not fatal because the FIR was not carried out by a deceased witness or the relative of the deceased and the site plan did not constitute specific evidence that the witnesses' statements There is a delay in recording. Neither the police's performance nor the credibility of the witnesses reflects, nor does the counseling or hard work break down because it gave a straightforward and straightforward account of the incident, which was proved by anecdotal evidence that an inadmissible Other eyewitness testimony came from independent evidence coming from sources. The word does not really bear witness to the occasion because the incident took place in a square and not in a secluded place, and its testimony was not a hereditary defect or instability identification parade was necessary because both, witnesses said At the time the accused was seen and one of them joined the police party who had pursued the accused and arrested him, there was no mitigating situation available to the accused which he fully deserved. The death sentence, however, when the trial judge was sentenced to death as a punishment by the trial court without practicing purification of Al-Shohad, whatever the Islamic conviction, and Section 2424, The accused were convicted under PPC. According to prosecution witnesses, the attempt to commit murder was set aside when you need a advocate from Pirpai lawyer