ALAMSHER versus HUKAM KHAN
The Code of Conduct 1908 and A-XXXIX, RR1 and 2 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), sections 42 and 54 of the Suite Declaration and Permanent Order Withholding Order, grant the grant of such lawsuit in favor of unregistered sale deed Was done The plaintiff's application for a temporary injunction in connection with the trial property was filed so that the plaintiff could not build on the suit property or exclude it without the consent of the plaintiff. The plaintiffs alleged that they had purchased the suit property. The original owner and he were in the same ownership because the documents produced by the parties in the proof of ownership related to his purchase do not show that such documents were in relation to the same property which was the subject of a dispute between the parties. The plaintiffs' respective claims to prove the documents presented by them did not identify the suit property because the boundaries in the two documents were not the same since an initial decision could not be made at the initial stages and available records, In order to seek relief due to a temporary nature, the court order below conforms to Sue was temporary order the claimant to discharge finalized, was correct and can not interfere in it.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Kotla Arab Ali Khan lawyer