MUHAMMAD NAWAZ AND 4 OTHERS versus THE STATE
Section 2/2 / 2424F / 777F (ii) (iii) Appraisal of evidence There was no enmity between the parties except for the purpose that according to the prosecution was a land dispute between the parties which was related to each other. There was a spot on the spot and both sides did not disclose the trajectory behind the incident and the original motive remained shrouded in mystery; the revered version presented by the parties did not take into account the incident, the two accused and all witnesses. Witnesses have been injured, and witnesses may be present on the spot. Medical evidence should not be suspected is relevant to the evidence witnesses The circumstances, incident, injuries are attributable to both parties and it is intended by both parties, if any dispute is put in, it can be concluded. It is a matter of sudden battle without any intrigue. Since it was a free fight, everyone was responsible for his own individual act that he was accused of. The roles attributed to them respectively
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Jhang lawyer
