RAUNIQ ALI versus MUHAMMAD MANSOOR BUTT
Under the suit trial for possession of title by section 115 of the Property Act 1882 section 54 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), the Court of Appeal upheld the plaintiff's trial, being a joint venture. The entry clearly indicated that he had never sold a particular area for sale. The sale showed that the claimant purchased the land from the joint property of the seller and his brothers and sisters and It has not sold any exclusive territory in the possession of this seller. Patwari's statement confirms the process that the specific dues number in which the land purchased by the claimant was not distributed till now the claimant had purchased the land jointly owned by the seller, his brothers and sisters, at that time Could not sue for this property until he or she receives it. The area purchased by him was determined by a court of competent jurisdiction and determined who was in possession of the seam, e lieking and rejecting the plaintiffs' claims in the trial. The trial court order was restored while the appellate court order was set aside in the cases.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Jehlum lawyer