SHAH GHULAM QADIR versus IQBAL KAZZAQ BUTT
The Special Relief Act 1877 Section 12 Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 62 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), the Section 3 High Court appealed to the Single Bench of the High Court, while in the case the land-related sale agreement The specific performance was fully considered. The evidence presented by the parties, including the documents presented in the evidence, was discussed with a wide range of reasons for each of the issues involved. During the trial, the single bench ordered the defendants to collect the balance of sale according to which the defendants failed. Defendants were cited as having delayed the completion of the agreement and on the completion of the delay agreement, so indicate any reading or misinterpretation of the evidence, as they had no reasonable / reasonable explanation of the justification. Through the notices, the plaintiffs sought to innovate the original contract. Delivery of the agreement was not guaranteed delivery The results recorded by C will not be guaranteed to interfere with the appeal after the judgment of the plaintiff by the Division Bench of the High Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Kot Bunglow lawyer