GUL MUHAMMAD SHAH versus NASEER AHMAD
Special Relief Act 1877 Section 42 Lawsuit for declaration for refusal to sign the sale agreement by the plaintiff, section 78 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), section 96, which the plaintiff has Was deposited in the bank. The account, the bank official, dismissed that the demand draft was deposited in the bank account of the claimant and the claimant was barred in the presence of documents that constitute the bank officer's evidence to defame the bank's originality. And submitted the slip from the bank's signature records. The plaintiff's contract of sale was proven and was considered by the trial court, the trial court did not properly justify it, therefore, there was no interference with the trial court's finding.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Killa Saifullah lawyer
