SOHAIL MUHAMMAD SHEES FAROOQ versus MST. MIZNA ROOMANA
Article 5 of the Muslim Marriages Act 1939 dissolved and the Schedule of Muslim Marriages Act (VIII of 1939), Section 2 (ix) sought to dissolve the dissolution of the marriage on the grounds that his consent to the marriage was fraudulent. Was obtained through yogurt. That the age parties are very different because the husband was fifty years old when she was 26 years old. That she was a postgraduate while her husband was an intermediate. That the husband was already married and had five children with his first wife and that the husband believed in evil spirits. The wife's desire to dissolve the marriage was that it was impossible to live with such a role within God's boundaries when an earth was forced to dissolve. Regarding marriage, which cannot be settled by God as husband and wife, the court has to decide that if the marriage is permitted and the marriage is not dissolved, the minimum standard Can remain intact. The termination of such institution was rightly ordered to dissolve the marriage, in view of the specific allegations leveled against the wife's husband.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Adda Shaiwala lawyer