Find a Lawyer

KHANA JAN versus S.H.O.

Appeal against the stolen rickshaws that were exempted from the possession of section 417 suspects was not recovered nor any document seized by the Pakistan Penal Code section 381/406/420/467/468/471/411 I was taken to the Office of Excise and Taxation Officer for investigation for thumb impression or handwriting comparison test, neither by the police nor by the accused's handwriting and thumb impressions were obtained, The complainant did not produce any document on record to establish his ownership. The pre-recorded evidence does not link the accused with the suspicion of the rickshaws purchased on different dates from different persons, although the remaining evidence in the witnesses' calendar, even if examined, is the accused. Complainant's case against him will not rise and prove. The case was delayed for more than four years and despite considerable opportunity provided, the litigation failed to produce evidence against the accused as he went beyond reasonable doubt against the accused to establish a case. I was unsuccessful, it was not a case that should be remanded for a re-hearing when it was already more than four years before the last trial would be appealed against. Extraordinary, dismissed, in circumstances top advocate from Multan lawyer