Find a Lawyer

KARAMAT ALI versus THE STATE

Section 302/324/148/149 In the absence of the trial and the accused, the accused, who was initially absconding, was declared absconding from the law and was tried in absentia and the accused was later arrested. And wires of judgment were sent against him. In absentia, the trial court claimed that he was deprived of his defense and had been denied an absentee trial, but without giving the participant an opportunity to defend, he would also violate these principles of natural justice. That no one could be. The perpetrator had rightfully claimed that the trial was not brought against him and was not concluded according to law and in this case it was illegal, invalid and unenforceable punishment to be sentenced in a criminal case. And the conviction sentenced to the accused was set aside and the case remanded. In the presence of the accused in the trial, the law requires a fresh trial [fugitive] famous supreme court advocate from Kurram Agency lawyer