SHER MUHAMMAD versus STATE
Sections 19 and 32 Criminal Procedures (V9 1898), Sections 340 (l) Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 (b) / 34, 324/34 and 394/34 Special Court Courts Providing separate defense advice to each accused of car inspection was beyond its legal responsibility. Two attorneys said he was set on state expenditures and had no opportunity to get in touch with the accused and should have given them two days to prepare the case. Failing to comply with the letter and spirit of the code of conduct set forth under s, the CCP acted grossly unlawfully, which adversely affected the trial and resulted in the acquittal of the convicts. And the case was remanded to special remand. Court of Appeal Tribunal for the latest trial in accordance with law from the stage of preparation of the charge in keeping with the observations of C, C
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Rawat lawyer
