Find a Lawyer

OBAIDULLAH KHAN versus INAYATULLAH KHAN

Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Sections 155 (2) and 561A Prohibition (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3, 4, 16 and 22 On the basis of an investigation of unidentified crimes, the CIA is summoned. The Department, the police, had no authority to file or investigate the case, when the subjects of the FIR were made through Article 16, the Prohibition (Enforcement Hadith) Order 1979, and a section I / CIA admission. Outward crime was not detected. And the raiding of the accused's house by the police party was in violation of Article 22, the Prohibition (Enforcement Hadith) Order, 1979. The reinforcement was canceled with the observation that it was only mentioned in the FIR that senior officers were being transferred to seek permission. Permission to investigate and investigate the accused's case was granted on the same date that the case was registered against the accused and it was a cognizable offense under Section 3, Prohibition (Enforcement Hadith) Order, 1979, irrespective of Regardless of the question whether it was done in a public place or where a case related to facts related to both unrecognizable and unrelated crimes was registered, Section 155 (2), the PC was not attracted. And the police can do all the investigations. In cases where the accused did not have a case without the permission of the magistrate in which the police raided the information or information through an informant, but during the investigation when the co-accused, who himself or the partner of the accused Was declared illegal liquor storage, and all found on the identification of such partner, Article 22, Prohibition (Enforcement) Order 1979, thus, the right to sue the accused famous lower court advocate from Liaquat Pur lawyer