BAHAWAL KHAN versus ALLAH WADHAYA
Civil Procedure Code Order VII (V of 1908), O VII, R 11 of Section 13 of the CPC Plaintiff and Section 115 case for the plaintiff before the plaintiff's dismissal for the transfer of the claimant. What was In fact, the plaintiff's request for a sale transaction was accepted in terms of O. VII, R11, CPC and the plaintiff was rejected on the basis that the requirements of the student were not served according to the law. And the order of the plaintiff's dismissal was upheld in the appeal The review filed by the plaintiffs was not properly documented because neither the copy of the notice nor the postal receipt were attached to the revision request, section 115 (1) For the first time, the CPC indicated that the documents, documents and subordinate court verifications affirmed the review request. With the help of Documentation review cannot be properly filed with such requirements. The High Court cannot interfere with the exercise of the jurisdiction ith the fact that unless there is a material unlawful proceeding or irregularity affecting the decisions of the courts, simultaneous inquiries indicate material irregularity or illegality Not reviewed, this review was not applicable
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Balakot lawyer