Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus STATE

Section 302/34 Convention of Conduct (10 of 1984), Article 76 (C) High Court (Lahore) Rules, Volume 111, Chap 11c Definition of Proof Identification Identification of Parade Secondary Proof of Permission and Addition of Permission Not Allowed Can be given. In view of the provisions of Article (76 (c) of the Convention of Martyrs) in the form of his photostat, it was alleged that he remained with the police for several days when the possibility of his arrest could not be disclosed to eyewitnesses. The rifle, especially when such an objection was raised in the absence of the original report to the Supervising Magistrate Photostat Copy of the Supervisor during the identification parade, could not be substantiated by the Magistrate in the case. Even the aforementioned report covers its certificate as per the High Court Rules and Regulations. Listed in Chapter 11C, the Vo1 III identity parade was, thus, no legal vacant possession of the crime when the recovered rifle was not fired, with no legal value against the accused. No, it was not disclosed that the sealed parcel of crime was ever presented in the forensic science laboratory report.The serologist was also not presented in evidence. The prosecution failed to link the accused, They were evicted [ID parade] law websites from Kot Mithan lawyer