HABIB CREDIT AND EXCHANGE BANK LTD. versus GULZAR AHMED
In addition to assigning Article 3 of the Civil Procedure Code Order XXII O XXII, R 10, 0 1, R 10 & O XLIII, R 1 La Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), the CPC's death, marriage and enforcement The appellant's substitution of the trial was ordered to include the defendant as a defendant in preference to the original defendant to be substituted for the court in case of any interest or assignment during the trial. Which will cover O XXII, R 10, CPC. However, the guiding principle in OI, R 10, CPC, however, is that the discretion of the court in such matters still remains, as will the dissolution of the Disto Judge so as to substitute for alternatives. May also be allowed. Where there is no possible reason for the defendants to be discriminated against, the reason may be that the defendant could be included because of the prosecution or the accompanying lawsuit and when the plaintiff was facing injury and When it turned out that I could not complete the entire claim by the appellant, the best way would be to have the appellate order of the alternate HC (single judge) instead of the appellant whereby the appellant would have to replace the original plaintiff. It was ordered to be included as a defendant, in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
