Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAMIM versus THE STATE

Before the trial of the Pakistan Penal Code Section 364 Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), evidence was questioned against the accused Victim, and in response to this, the trial court was satisfied that he would be deposed in court. Was so intelligent in its evidence that Victim directly supported litigation in all material details involved. There was no inherent error in Lacone's evidence of his abduction from his home that night, and no strong reason was available to suspect his version of the fact that his father was in critical condition The person's testimony was confirmed physically. After the crime when the accused was awakened from sleep, he left her back home as the accused was known to the victim and the first informant, he was specifically named in the FIR on the accused. No one was involved in the delay in filing the FIR, if any, so the prosecution's case was neither effective nor prejudicial, especially when such a delay was satisfactory as previously reported. This was explained by Reliable and sufficient to conclude that he was forcibly taken to the hill, forced to remove his sword and subjected to adultery, the victim of such incident was dressed in human clothing. Blood was detected, causing severe pain in his body and causing it. Report it to his father at odd hours of the night when he was dropped off by the accused at the Victim's house, or his father had no reason or intention to raise an ax against the accused or the real culprit. Of law websites from Choa Saiden Shah lawyer