Section 13D of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 allegedly recovered the evidence from the suspect's possession - the search resulted in neither being sealed in the presence of the victim nor a ballistic expert sent for confirmation. That was the effect of the act or otherwise the weapon. Even during the trial, neither the details were given nor the details were given, and there is evidence that the weapon found in the court came on record, such a situation made the accused. The suspected Investigation Officer who was a Section H Police Officer. The relevant station acted as prosecutor, investigator and witness, the prosecution evidence was not sufficient to maintain the conviction of the accused, the accused was convicted and acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
