GHULAM HUSSAIN GUL versus PROVINCE OF SINDH
Sindh Service Tribunals Act 1973 Section 4 Sindh Civil Servants (Probation, Certification and Sanity) Rules, 1975, R13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Promotion, Prevention of Retention Official serving as Constitution Inspector The employee (BPS 16) was promoted to the post of Deputy Superintendent of Police (BPS 17), but his development was immediately withdrawn until a corruption case was finalized. Yes, the government employee filed a constitutional petition before the High Court challenging the public servant. To touch on the question of the ability of a public servant to promote, the criteria adopted were capable of experimenting on the scales of reason or logic that cover concepts of fitness or fitness. As such, it would include elements of personal consideration and such matters were not normally open. Judicial investigations where eligibility matters were involved or if someone else was not properly considered to promote b e, then if he was a civil servant, the service tribunal, especially in such cases, The scope of the review included in the option was very limited and even where it was expanded, it had to be used extensively. Care and Caution Case In view of the corruption action against the civil servant, the High Court refused to examine the merits of the dispute that a service tribunal would remain and the constitutional jurisdiction to test the authenticity of the reconsideration order I could not bring the case. Of the High Court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Umer Kot lawyer