Find a Lawyer

ARSHAD RAZZAQ versus THE STATE

Sections 249A and 561 Retaining a Request to Stop an Action Such request was challenged because of the pending application of the accused filed under Section 249A, CRPC, which observed that 5 561A, the application under CRPC is both not applicable. Was the same trial court fully empowered to acquit the accused under Section 249A, whether the CCPC found the charge against the accused at any stage of the trial unfounded or unlikely? That the accused jurisdiction under section conv61 AA is available, CRPC was the same as is available to the trial court under section 249A, CCPC, in both section 249A and / IA In view of the language used, the CCPC for the trial court used the appropriate course at its discretion previously available under 5 249A, CRPC. The application was rejected, then 551A, the resort under section 555A, CR PC had to be removed to the extent the proceedings were terminated under CR PC; , The request made by the accused under CRPC was directed to be dealt with under the law. famous lower court advocate from Khushal Kot lawyer