MUHAMMAD SHABIR versus MUHAMMAD MUNIR
Pakistan Penal Code Section 497 (5) Contempt of Regulation (XLV of 1860), section 646464 / ail 34 bail, because of the cancellation of the bail, the accused was allowed, even though all the prosecution witnesses mentioned the five accused in the FIR Was added, evidence of the prosecution's testimony. Only two of the five suspects were found to be reliable, and one of the suspects whose bail was granted and the investigation also found that the role of the accused was similar to that of the accused, who was granted bail. And the trial court found the principle of consistency applicable. The accused, entitled to bail, was in the recording phase of the prosecution's evidence and the trial court recorded the statement of a prosecution witness and at that stage it was not appropriate for the accused to withdraw the bail exception. was done. After the affidavit, after the bail, the accused misused his liberty The bail granted to the accused was not canceled
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Kamokey lawyer