MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus MIANJEE KHAN
Accessing States (Property) Order 1961 (PO No 12 of 1961) The provisions of Articles 3, 4 and 7 of the Bar in the jurisdiction of the Arts 3, 4 and 7 show that the devolution of the property belonging to the ruler To tackle the problem. Death When a dispute arose between those claiming to be heirs and successors of the ruling federal government in this case, he could determine the extent of the right and share: for the party's commitment to the claimants' property. The transfer of property was not related to the claimants through inheritance but the real question in the dispute was the claimant and the claimant claiming that he had been cultivating the land since his ancestors' time before the settlement of the land and The entries in the revenue records were recorded incorrectly, thus, this issue is not restricted Is. Under Article 7, Accessing States (Property) Orders, 1961, the suit was remanded to the trial court for further judgment on merit as well as H law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Panjan Kisan lawyer
