ARBAB ALI versus DEPUTY DIRECTOR, SINDH AGRICULTURAL SUPPLIES ORGANIZATION
Failure to repay the agricultural loan offered by the respondent (legal entity) by sections 81 and 82 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967, constitution Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 185 (3) 81 and 82, the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967 The High Court dismissed the petitioner's constitutional petition against debt collection. The applicant of the law suppressed certain factual aspects of the High Court in his constitutional plea, after which the High Court correctly noted that the relief constitution under Article 199, being equal to nature, was always a clear argument in the High Court. Whether it is to deny it or to achieve the end of justice depends solely on the legitimate exercise of discretion, but injustice can never be maintained where equal relief was sought, the same person must be sought. The issue of a constitutional plea with a clean hand was, thus, the correct action taken by the High Court, even on the merit, because the applicant had no case, therefore, he sought the behalf of the provincial government. Relied on a notification to suspend the receipt of a liability and cooperation from the provincial government of every kind. The notification, reported by the Societies, did not apply to the respondent organization, which was a legal institution and not a government department. The suspension period under the notification was over, and therefore, the dispute had no effect, so the appeal was denied. Conditions
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Karore Lalisan lawyer