GHULAM IQRAR KHAN versus SAKHI ZAMAN
Pakistan Penal Code Section 323/34 Definition of Evidence Defined Central Accuser The entire prosecution case fell to the ground with the conviction of the main accused, not only that the motive was proved wrong but it also gave the ocular evidence. Was also badly affected by which confidence was not affected. During the trial, the court denied the main allegations, which were acquitted, that all witnesses were related to each other, and that the unwanted witnesses who were allegedly involved in the incident did not want to present ineligible and independent witnesses. The prosecution's prosecution was not checked, was damaged. His own case is that, if they were presented, they would not support the prosecution's case, but the factual facts of the case were dismissed; the trial court denied medical evidence against the main accused, which Had a negative impact on molecular evidence. Observation of this case, especially when the ocular evidence was not affected by the trust unless the evidence of recovery can be relied upon does not advance the litigation matter or prove the prosecution case when the ocular evidence Was denied and dismissed, but the accused examined two witnesses in defense, but the trial court did not even speak on the record about the defense witness, and he only testified against the prosecution. And limited to the prosecution's case, any reasonable doubt against the accused after the trial, And the punishment was saved from punishment. And the accused were acquitted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Badin lawyer