Find a Lawyer

S. MUHAMMAD HASHIM versus THE STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 Sentencing Code (XLV of 1860) Section 302/324/109/34 Bail, grant of a prosecution case that was based on the alleged confessional statements of the accused did not fully support the accused's confessional statement. Gone. Because such statements were not only contradictory, they were recorded without warning on the 14th day of the arrest of the accused and the confessional certificate was not approved by the magistrate in the confessional statement. ? It appears that the faces of the attackers were stolen at the time of the incident, which occurred at 5pm 45 minutes in the first week of February, when the sun was set long before the incident. No details of the attackers were provided in the evidence. Receiving intervals could not be sufficient in connection with the identification that the accused should be released for bail exemption after the interval of MO. When the trial did not begin for more than 18 months, the co-accused was admitted on bail under similar circumstances; the accused was entitled to equal treatment in the eyes of the law and no exception to the bail was denied. Could have been done. Be released on bail under the circumstances famous lower court advocate from Sehwan lawyer