Find a Lawyer

ABDUL RAUF KHAN versus SALAH-UD-DIN MIRZA, PROVINCIAL OMBUDSMAN, SINDH

Article 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 207 and 1993 The appointment of a retired Judge of the Constitutional High Court as Provincial Ombudsman during the two-year period of his retirement man who retired as a Supreme Court or High Court Judge. He could not hold any office. To earn a profit in the service of Pakistan when he quit his office before the expiry of two years. However, it can be deployed to a judicial or sub judicial office, or the judicial office must comply with the discretion or decision made by the judicial office, which identifies the administrative office, which is based on the facts of the hearing, evaluation. Has jurisdiction to investigate or to detect. The evidence and conclusions, which were the basis of the arbitral proceedings or exercise of the Ombudsman's nature of the appointment, were used by the Ombudsman for the purpose of recording judicial powers. Was allocated with the option of. He could make recommendations and take other appropriate action on the identification material presented to him, the Office of the Ombudsman, even if it did not have a judicial office in all the terms of that term, did not have at least one judicial office, Article 207 (2) was not violated. Thus, the constitution came into force through the appointment of a retired judge of the High Court within two years of retirement, so no order could be issued in the nature of Quarto Veronto, therefore, in the circumstances of the appointment of a retired judge (defendant). No order could be issued against him. jobs for fresh advocates from Piaro goth lawyer