FAZAL KARIM versus RAWAL MALIK
Civil Code of Conduct 1908 Section 144 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Trial Rehabilitation Trial was retained by the appellate court before and the record High Court's affidavit also indicated that the restoration was restored. Is. The trial court, which granted permission to occupy under 5 144, the CPC had earlier ruled that the appellate court had separated the order by order of the High Court that the High Court refused to interfere with the order. There is nothing illegal or weak in the governing order. Whereby the respondents were ordered to be restored to possession as a result of setting aside the decree passed in favor of the applicant. There is no trial interference case. The High Court was granted leave of appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Chicha watni lawyer