Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SAADULLAH KHAN versus MITHA KHANAR


Constitution Pakistan 1973 Section 42 Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Article 185 (3) The plaintiff for the declaration of title and ownership of the property under question is entitled in favor of 3/5 of such property on the basis of gifts in his favor. What is claimed The latter ultimately found that the claimant deserves to take part in the review through it, however, to the extent of 1/5 of such property and to interfere with the High Court in such a decided plaintiff's case. Is not allowed. Finding facts that were neither based on misinterpretation of evidence nor have the courts left to consider any significant piece of evidence. That the High Court failed to consider the alleged death penalty by the three women (donors) in favor of the Plaintiff, so the High Court inquiry was received for not considering the documentary evidence already on record. ? Dispute raised

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Chashma lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.