Find a Lawyer

ABDUL SHAKOOR versus SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER (LANDS), LAHORE

Articles 10 and 11 of the Homeless Persons (Land Settlement) Act 1958, Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) certify the specific units as the claimant belonging to the Jammu and Kashmir respondent (woman) to the Constitutional petition. The claim was made, the respondent was allotted / certified a part of his claim in the specific village; the rest of his unit was not satisfied yet when the deputy settlement commissioner ordered the entire applicant's predecessors in the village. Allotted after which the parties entered the litigation, the respondents claim that he is sitting in the village allotment, claiming his delay He's should have satisfied before the allotment. The High Court of Persons finally accepted the Respondents' request and directed that no one else be satisfied before the allotment. Valetti Petitioners claim that the defendant units were transferred to another district, which was also removed by the maintenance authorities. The court hearing in which he claimed that the defendant's units were in fact transferred to another village in the same district. Applicants through the Supreme Court failed to submit any order directing / authorizing the transfer of the defendant units outside the village to the High Court. Correctly found that the orders of the Settlement Officers were not open to interfere with the constitutional jurisdiction, for the respondent woman to be a temporary allottee of the particular village, where she had also confirmed some land in her name, Thus, the allotment of land under question was the preferential right. Of competing contenders list of supreme court advocates from Sukkur lawyer