Find a Lawyer

NAVEED SIKANDAR versus ZAFAR MEHMOOD

Limitation Act 1908 Section 12 (5) [As added by the Limitation (Amendment) Act (1991 XIII of 1991]) requ Demand of time \ Attention ??? Requirement of time ??? Time interval between the day on which the duplicate will be considered And the day on which the applicant was actually notified that the copy would be ready for delivery on time, thus, as soon as the copy would be ready for delivery, but it would be Will start to move along. In fact, the date on which the copy would be ready for delivery was made on the day the petitioner's copy was ready for delivery in 1996, but there was still nothing to suggest whether the applicant. Was notified about the day the copy will be ready. The applicant for the conveyance claimed that he was given the date 5-5 1996 as a date for submitting the copy, so he went there and any information specified by Section 12 (5), the Limitation Act, 1908. In the presence of, submitted on 8 1996 1996. T will count as he appealed the date of application for copy delivery till the date of delivery of the copy, therefore, on the basis of time, the appellate court exercised its jurisdiction in the count. The copy was ready from the date of application for delivery of the copy. For delivery, according to the law he was unable to obtain powers, the matter was referred to the appellate court for judgment on the merits of the case [law and words]. best advocate from Chunian lawyer