KHAWAJA INTERNATIONAL (PVT.) LIMITED versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE
The Special Relief Act, 1877, section 42 the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 120 and Section 5 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 115 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitutional Petition legalized the decisive statute. Claimed to challenge the changes. The delimitation trial court granted condolences to the delay in filing such cases. The court set aside the delay verdict in the case, reviewing the trial court's failure to present a competent order, An application was made under the competent trial court under Section 5, Limitation Act, 1908, which cannot be entertained. Had acted illegally and with material misconduct, therefore, the reviewing court was capable of justifying this error, subject to the delay in adjourning the trial, under section 115, CPC The decision I made was delayed by a decision. Editable Verification The amending court did not exercise the jurisdiction to amend the trial court's correct order. It is believed to be illegal or subject to material misconduct that will subject further scrutiny through constitutional petitions. No interference in the High Court's constitutional jurisdiction was called against the exercise of the amended jurisdiction which was properly exercised in accordance with the law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Murree lawyer