Find a Lawyer

ASGHAR ALI versus STATE

Defining the evidence in Sections 300, Exceptions 1, 302 and 304, Part I is stated in the FIR as the version of the prosecution in connection with the murder of the victim, filing an FIR immediately completes the prosecution's testimony. Was supported. The recovery of medical evidence and weapons of crime as provided in the FIR was also proved as the accused did not deny the same defense case as 5 2 342, established in the statement of the accused under CRPC. It was also confirmed by the statement of one of the prosecution. When witnesses testified that a person abducting the accused's sister had already married the accused's second sister, he did not divorce the accused's second sister, It was submitted by the prosecution that the accused had accused the deceased in the kidnapping of the accused's sister, keeping both versions in the case of Jammu, the defense has submitted that the accused was molested due to the affidavit. Was killed and the sudden outbursts, as well as the fact that his involvement in the crime and the presence of the accused, were correct because the murder of the deceased was a cause of concern. This resulted in a 1 to 5 hundred exceptions in the case of sudden provocation, in which case the PPCN can only be punished under 304, under Part 1, PPC Section 302. The accused was found guilty, the PPC was replaced under section 304, Part I, PPC. jobs for advocates from Gari Mori lawyer