Find a Lawyer

ALEEM JAFFAR, EX-LINE SUPERINTENDENT, WAPDA, LAHORE versus WAPDA

Section 17 (1A) [as amended by the Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority (Amendment) Act (XIII of 1994)] Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 WAPDA Employee Removal or Retirement Plain Effect Where Removal Order Inappropriate or retirement was simple and there was no tainting, the fact that the authority had initiated a departmental disciplinary proceeding before the approval of such an order, was in no way a legally flawed order. Will not be an order under which the terms of section 17 (1) are not easy. A) The act but because of it was based on the showcase notice and the employee's response, the questioner was concerned that the employee's removal order was set aside and the employee with the benefit of the amended section according to the terms of the amended section Was restored. 17 (1A) of the Act, however, was obliged to notify its employees in writing on the ground that it was proposed to take action and would be given an opportunity to show cause in the writ. Within a period of fourteen days, the Authority shall have the authority to pass a fresh order against the employee pursuant to section 17 (1A), as amended by the West Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority Act 1958. pakistani advocates Baroute lawyer