MUHAMMAD YOUNAS KHILJI versus CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, ISLAMABAD
Arts 199 and 185 () Constitutional Application Capital Development Authority Petitioner had the highest bid given by the auctioneer, and the auction was not confirmed when accepting the bid deposit amount for the plot's auction price. Neither the plot was auctioned. Prior to filing a constitutional petition in the High Court, the CDA Validity Petitioner had ordered that it challenge the auction of the plot, requesting a refund of the auctioned value, which resulted in the cancellation. Captured by the Capital Development Authority. The auction refund was made on condition that the applicant do not challenge the restoration of the plot by the applicant of the Capital Development Authority, his affidavit expressly stated when he was confiscated. If the refund is refunded, it will not file a case / case. The amount against the Capital Development Authority accordingly has been returned to the applicant by the Capital Development Authority, Petit. Mirror was denied reasonable relief under Article 199 of the Constitution of Pakistan.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
