WAZIR ALI KHOJA versus MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD.
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts 199 and 185 ()) Master and Servant Constitution Application Employee Privatization Bank Job Termination of Employment Except for the right to relief in the nature of warrant, the clause contained in the petition was not related to any employer. The warrant against the employee was neither directly challenged by the constitutional application filed by the employee before stating the facts nor mentioning the grounds for attacking in connection with the termination of his service. The court has no warrant, which is why the warrant is aided. The legal status of the order regarding the termination of service of employees under Article 199 of the Constitution under the authority of judicial review, however, was not extended until the inquiry but by the employee of the privatization / unincorporated entities through constitutional patentee Cannot challenge termination of services. n Article 29 of the Constitution does not guarantee interference with the dismissal of the High Court's job by dismissing the employees' constitutional petition and rationalizing and compromising their services.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
