MUHAMMAD RIAZ versus NOOR-UL-ISLAM
Article 18 Constitution of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 Pakistan (1973), Article 199 In the Family suit, the plaintiff against whom the suit was filed for payment of Dover amount did not appear in court itself. I was denied the document execution. The wife agreed to pay compensation The plaintiff was the only person who should appear in court at trial and was denied execution of the agreement by her agent, refusing to execute the contract was of no consequence. Because he was not one of the witnesses who gave the documents. And so, there was no knowledge of implementing the same clause of Section 18, the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, which did not apply to the defendant regarding the appearance of pregnant women, on the agreement by the defendant's agent. The refusal to execute was not properly relied upon. Through the trial court who found that the execution of the agreement was proved by trivial evidence
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Chicha watni lawyer