Find a Lawyer

MST. TAHIRA KHATOON versus S.H.O., FACTORY AREA, SARGODHA

The Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 452, 337d, 337f (1), 337h (2) and 334 constitutional petitioner claimed in its constitutional petition that the FIR applicant replied. The petitioner who seeks to seize the house who, along with her husband, had invaded the applicant and her husband twice under illegal design under his malicious design, resulting in two offenses against the applicant. Cases were filed and they stated that the defendant as a respondent claimant filed a case against the applicant's husband and his neighbor against Sections 452, 337D, 337F (I), 337H (2). Further, the case under PPC, which was a witness in the lawsuit filed against the applicant in his constitutional petition. The FIR was subsequently filed by the defendant against the applicant's husband and her neighbor. It was filed against him that the case filed against him was false and fabricated, and after a thorough investigation it had to be determined, only on the petitioner's statement that the FIR was terminated or canceled. Was tried, condoned for cause and the collective could not be stopped. On such a stage and so on advocates from Layyah lawyer