Find a Lawyer

FATIMA BIBI versus RAHEEM BIBI

Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) Act 1958 Section 10 & 11 Withdrawal Property And Displaced Persons Act (XIV Of 1975), Section 2 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition against the application of intelligence. The initial application was rejected for illegal prosecution. Later the application was submitted by two different individuals to restore the former petition, which was then linked to the applicants, and hence the dead horse was given a new one. A life-threatening attempt was made After the repeal of the withdrawal rules, no new application could be filed. Subsequently, the Mukhtar claimed that in addition to the land allotted to him in District BG, some place was allotted in District-Gin. The allotment of allotment was dropped on the basis of the suitability of such request. The applicant (Allottee) claimed that he had never applied for a land allotment in District \ G land and if such allotment was a fake and the land records under discussion did not show that the district. \ Gk Mukhtar had only prepared photocopy of LL II regarding the allotment, but the original record had no such entry The original tomb application was dropped, resulting in the latest application brought by different persons. Will be deemed to have been filed beyond the target's date, this was not applicable, therefore, the cancellation order based on this application There was no alteration that he was able to establish. District Gin never applied for a land allotment and only received land allotted to District B in order to cancel its allotment. immigration advocates from Lodhran lawyer