Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SAQLAIN versus STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 417 Appeal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Appeal against the Breath Foundation of the prosecution case was the testimony of two eyewitnesses, the complainant who was the father of the accused and the second defendant the complainant. The brother was reported to have left the dead body until nightfall and removed the body from the scene of the incident the next morning because he was threatened by the accused that if he took the dead body it would be unnatural. That the complainant, his father killed, allowed the body to be kept at the scene till late at night, the complainant could only go to the police station at least 3 furlongs Akh could get police help them to recover a dead body and to report the crime. The complainant, reporting the crime to the police, did not prove to be true. The trial court found it unusual that the victim's father, brother and cousin pursued the accused, who were forcible, without any physical interference or color. The Burlingo trial court duly observed that all the witnesses, who belonged to the deceased, played themselves as spectators and that the crime was an unexpected event and that counseling and consideration. After the affidavit, the four accused, all the brothers, were named accused in the case, since oral testimony on which the prosecution's accused RAW case was based, was deleted, so that there is no clear advantage of other evidence relating to discrimination and a short recovery fugitive arrest. After the approval of the trial-related trial based on the correct definition of evidence, the appeal will not guarantee interference. famous supreme court advocate from Kurram Agency lawyer