Find a Lawyer

NADEEM versus THE STATE

The accused accused himself of bargaining for the defect of section 5 (2) of the Anti-Corruption Act, 1947 (XLV of 1860), section 420/161/165, and received a defamatory currency note from the trap agents. Was in the respective room. The raiding respondents / papers were recovered from their possession by the raiding party at the time of the raid and with empty answers, so the prosecutor reasonably kept the argument in view of the above-mentioned and the above facts. The raiding party was unable to hear any dialogue between the accused and the trap agents inside the room, there was no emphasis on it and the accused's sentence was maintained under the circumstances. list of supreme court advocates from Nowshera Cantt lawyer