ABDUR REHMAN versus DIRECTOR, ADMINISTRATION AREA ELECTRICITY BOARD, WAPDA, FAISALABAD
Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973 R4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) On the evidence of mismanagement, the Mandatory Retirement Service Tribunal adopted a soft view; Was prevented Future Impact The period of absenteeism from duty, which was essentially a retirement from retirement, resulted in this order being considered an extraordinary leave without pay, the Service Tribunal's controversial ruling on a fair and fair government employee. Was reinstated in the job. The service tribunal had taken Lennant View from the service tribunal, setting aside their mandatory retirement order from the service; in the specific circumstances of this case, no further flexibility could be shown to the civil servant, the service tribunal substituted. I was able to change or suspend an inappropriate order. According to the law, the decision was granted only with the use of the mind due to valid grounds. The leave to appeal the facts and circumstances of the case was dismissed in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
