Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus TAJ MUHAMMAD

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 15 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) was previously upheld by two courts before the High Court. The accuracy plaintiffs could not identify any weakness in the investigation conducted with the three courts on the plaintiff's case. Earlier, the defendant's right to detention claimed that even though the plaintiffs were instructed by the trial court and the appellate court to deposit a certain amount, they actually deposited less money, hence, their case. Was dismissed, defendants complained that such a point was specifically taken. On the basis of the review but the High Court did not attend it, the adherents of the High Court decision have shown that the defendants did not exert such pressure at the hearing of the objections to the determination of the question of fact, That is, the defendants had already submitted the arrest amount. The determination of whether or not to be directed by the lower appellate court, while the Supreme Court will hear the facts on the petition for leave to appeal, will demand a fact-finding inquiry, however, following a proper order Such an object could be more properly raised at the import stage, in which case his appeal was denied. top civil advocates from Qasba Gujrat lawyer