Find a Lawyer

GHULAM HUSSAIN versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 2302/7 30/3 323/4 504 / evidence 34 Definition of evidence was related to conflicts and contradictions in the case which later died, according to the prosecution the deceased's name was a son while according to the medical Injury reports and counselors, the son of a prosecutor, did not resolve the contradiction and mystery as to who was actually the victim, did I actually have a son killed as a result of the alleged injuries. , Or not. Because of the controversial evidence, the trial court did not even consider the root of the matter going to the root of the case, which alleged that they had committed murder. I did not prove my son as a prosecution witness. Were closely related to. Attempted to be a true witness, but their evidence did not affect trust because of material contradictions and lack of free harmony. The fact that the prosecution witness was an injured person did not mean That what he said was true The evidence on the record showed that there were a number of unwanted witnesses at the time of the incident, but no independent and unwanted witnesses were examined. The stop was not only fatal to the prosecution case, but the prosecutor himself broke the independent piece of evidence because the FIA According to R, the prosecution was not proven and the trial also gave results based on the purpose of persecution. For any strong or cautious reason and the trial court did not question the accused under section 342, evidence of CR's recovery was also used jobs for fresh advocates from Chiniot lawyer